Friday, November 29, 2013


Blade Runner

I.          Introduction


·       Blade Runner is a film that takes place in the year 2019 in L.A. where the main protagonist Deckard (Harrison Ford) is a Blade Runner. His job is to find four outlaw replicants and retire them. This job starts out just like every other retirement job he’s had in the past until he is given a reason to question his own existence.


 


 


II.          Characteristics and Conventions of the film that link Blade Runner to classic film noir.


A.    Cinematic and Landscape. 


1.     Almost all of the movie is shot at night with it raining most of the time.


2.     Inside shots are with cigarette smoke and angled lighting.


      a. when Holden is interviewing Leon the room is filled with cigarette with celling fans    slowly turning over head and the lighting is angled though a window showing the shadows, like something you would see the classic Marlow style film.


3.     Architecture has buildings that were present back in the days of old school noir like the Bradbury building. With the classic 4th st tunnel in L.A. being one of the road ways.


B.    Protagonist Deckard


1.     Deckard throughout the movie is more like the Philip Marlow style detective from the movie The Big Sleep. He is a retired lowly detective that has been brought back to life because of his ruthless style of work, he also was not the first choice to do this job like in The Big Sleep. He is for the most part a drunk and when confronted by the bad guys he gets beaten up and ends up only shooting woman replicants.


2.     Deckard’s attire is the black dirty trench coat style who is just the average looking sort, nothing to write home about. The kind of looks you see when you look at Humphrey Bogart.


3.     Deckard’s meeting with Zhora in her dressing room where he plays a nerdy rights activist couldn’t have come any closer then when boogie is playing the nerdy type book collector at the bookstore/porn outlet.


C.    Femme Fatale


1.     Rachel’s femme fatale looks date right out of the 40s her hair is folded like you would see on Barbara Stanwick from double indemnity


2.     Although Rachel’s femme fatale is short lived as a traditional noir bad girl her appearance in the interview with Deckard is classic noir as they trade shots back and forth. “Is this a test to see if I’m lesbian or a replicant” is classic boogie and Lauren Bacall.


III.          Elements of the film that Deviate from the Classic Film Noir and link it to Neo Noir


A.    Cinematic and Landscape and deferent cultures and not human.


1.     Even though Scott keeps with a mostly classic style atmosphere he intertwines it with flying cars and a city that bellows fire from the industrial towers that surround the city.


2.     The film is shot in color instead of black and white.


3.     Throughout the film we see a mixture of deferent races and even main character’s that are not human.


B.    Protagonist


1.     Deckard transform’s into a detective who is in question of his own being. After finding out that memories can be installed into their DNA make up. And as the clues build up, like being able to play the piano and dreaming of unicorns. He fights with the reality that he may be hunting and killing replicants and that he may be one of them. 


C.    Femme fatale


1.     Rachel is transformed into a woman who then realizes she is a replicant and only kill’s to protect the man she is following in love with. Not by greed or ambition but as necessity.


IV.           Dual Protagonist


A.    Roy is the leader of the outlaw replicants and my opinion is the second protagonist. He also displays traits as being a detective on a mission to find the man who made him.


1.     Roy’s reference to the man who made him as father as if he were talking to god. And this relates to the protagonist trying to find himself through a religious venue. This keeps with past Neo Noir.


2.     Roy show more human traits then Deckard as he save the man who is trying kill him. Transforming villain into victim. 


 Quotes from outside sources to implicate references to Classic and Neo Noir.


Sammon, Paul. Future Noir: The Making of Blade Runner. New York: HarperPrism, 1996. Print.


        In his book Future Noir: The Making of Blade Runner. Paul Sammon really puts the visual elements of the classic noir detective in words as he states “Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), the films protagonist, a cynical, world-weary ex-cop, Deckard exhibits all the familiar icons of the burned-out detective; he wears a trench coat, and drinks too much” (4). Blade Runner set the pace for how to make a future sci-fi movie. Still contain the classic Noir feel. Combining the classic look of Philip Marlow along with the self-destructive tendencies that we all know to be classic boogie. Even in the future we cannot escape the look and feel that we have been here before. And that the still iconic look and feel of classic noir is alive and well in the future.


 


Abrams, Jerold J.  Space, Time, and Subjectivity in Neo-Noir Cinema (2007): 1-14. Ebscohost. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.


        When it comes to the true essence of the Neo-Noir character conflict. Jerold Abrams really connects the meaning of this in his article Space, Time, and Subjectivity in Neo-Noir Cinema. In whereas he states “rather than looking for a criminal in the city that surrounds him, now the detective’s search is for himself, for his own identity and how he may have lost it.” (1). Blade Runner takes that’s who am I really and goes that one step further by asking the question am I even human? In neo noir we know that there may be some kind of amnesia element that the protagonist is trying to solve but Ridley Scott takes that one step further and shocks us with the reality of is this all a dream? Humanity has evolved into machines that look and feel like the real thing with memories of the past that are someone else’s. And even if they are not human they still have the overall same problems as humans and that is they want to live, feel, and love.


 


Film Clip


        The film clip is from the interview between Deckard and Rachael and is being done at the Tyrel building. The film clip display’s classic Noir shadows and low lighting, along with showing the classic noir dress and attire of both Deckard and Rachael. The interview is being done by the way of a machine called a Voight-Kampff test; this tester resembles the modern day lie detector test as thus leads into present day noir. Deckard discovers during this test that Rachael is a replicant and at the same time by the reaction that is given by Deckard, Rachael now has suspicions about her own humanity.  After the test is given Deckard asks Tyrel the question that starts the whole ball rolling “how can it not know what it is.”  This clip transform’s not only Deckard but also Rachael from the traditional style Noir protagonist and femme fatale to the Neo Noir divided detective trying to figure out who or what he is. 20:20 to 22:27

6 comments:

  1. you presentation was really interesting , even though you said you now hate the movie you still made it sound like an amazing film. I have never seen it so i might take the chance to watch once but without trying to analyze it I don't want to hate it. great job in your presentation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. First off, I commend you for choosing this film. It sounds like a very hard film to watch over and over again, and analyze for the small details that almost anyone would overlook that make it noir.
    Secondly, I like that you reference older movies that are already cemented in noir history, and you constantly compare characters to those in The Big Sleep and such. It gives someone like me, who has not seen Blade Runner, a good idea of what your characters might be like.
    Third, I like that you identified two protagonists. That is an odd thing for any movie, and is very interesting.
    I think your presentation was good, and you did a good job of getting the details of this past, present and future noir film.

    A question, unrelated to the movie.. Why is this almost all in caps?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know I already told you this, but you did an excellent job breaking down Blade Runner, a task which is by no means simply. The film is incredibly dense, so I can imagine you must have had a hard time isolating and signifying all the information. You brought up many large and minute details that I was unaware of, like the mixture of car styles that gave the film a flavor of both past and future noir. Your insights on the protagonist becoming the villain and vice versa was interesting as well, it took me to the observations made by Abrams. And of course, any discussion on Blade Runner would be incomplete without a mention of its photography, but you delivered. The selections of images you chose really highlighted some of its beautiful images and you commented on all of them, noting their relevance. And lastly, you presented your information very well, having a clear grasp of all the material. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've never seen the film Blade Runner and hearing you and the class talking about it doesn't make me want to, hearing how confusing is sound. But, I think you did a very good job knowing the ends and outs of your movie. I also enjoyed how you explored over aspects of the film that really didn't need to be researched, but you did it anyways just to be knowledgeable on your film. Another thing that was interesting was the contrast between all the pictures you showed and how different scenes were looked at throughout the film. Overall I really enjoyed your presentation and how much information you had stored about the film. My favorite part was when you were about to explain the unicorn at the end and how the meaning meant something way different then what another classmate thought it was.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I haven't seen this movie at all and by reading your post it seems okay but something that doesn't interest me. You did a very good job and identifying the dual protagonist, certainly neo noir with multiple detectives. And as usual the femme fatale is a significant character, your analysis of her was spot on in terms of the classic noir femme fatale but there are differences as you stated in your post, over you did a great job.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you did a great job with your presentation! I haven't seen the movie and I think you did good with your research comparing it to neo-noir and film noir.

    ReplyDelete